I rented m home out for a short time I had the water turned off, and the tennants were to get service in there name. The F. H PUD required a sec. dep from the tennants to have water service.
Long story short, they were bad renters, didn't pay rent or there bills.
Insted of the Foresthill PUD turning off the water to the home when there required security deposit was used up they continued to allow the tennants bill to climax.
When I finily got the tennants out, I learned that the water was off, I was asked to sign a contract to take responsibility to the tennants water bill, which was close to $400.00 over there required security deposit by the Foresthill PUD.
I have received one pervious bill in the amount of $48.21 threw 10-05-2010 which I paid. and than on Friday 11-12-2010 I received a bill for $440.78 dated 08-19-2010 to 10-15-2010.
I cannot find anyone who regulated this district, I know for a fact that the tennants has an aunt who works for the Foresthill PUD, I spoke with Curt Reed the head guy, who was very sny, about the whole thing, I asked him " Why was the tennant required to pay a security deposit to turn on the service, and than allowed to go over their security deposit amount and to continue to rack up the bill?
His reply was that there was a leak, I told Kurt that I was never notified until after the fact, so why is this my responsibility? Kurt just said that, it's the law in California, have he will not give me water service but I will continue to be charged the minum sercharge until I pay the tennants account in full.
I have been charge late fees, disconect fees, rehookup fees, I think this is just criminal, and in closing I told Curt Reed, "I hope this happeneds to him, and he might be a little more hummbled. His reply was "I pay my bills!, I told him that this is not my bill if it was I should have been receiving an invoice, he replyed with, "WELL I WILL JUST LEAN YOUR PROPERTY"
I told him that I sent the payment in full and that I did it under protest. He hung up on me.
Read Next Complaint >>