HSBC Complaint

bad economy, bank mobster! - wire transfer

The economy is really bad, and it seems that banks are robbing consumers’ money whenever possible. I would like to share with you my personal story, hoping that you can make the public aware of this issue. I have a checking account in HSBC France and in HSBC US respectively. I made a wire transfer of 7500 euros from France to the US last Friday (March 13 2009), and the money arrived on March 18, with only 9477.75 dollars (I sent the money in euro, so the change was made in the US). However, Wednesday’s market rate was 1 euro=1.35 dollars. So normally I should have had around 10125 dollars (that’s what they told me on Wednesday, saying that they would contact their wire transfer team to know why there is a short of 600 dollars). They called me yesterday, giving me another answer: the amount in dollars was calculated according to the date where wire transfer was initiated, i.e. Monday. However, Monday’s market rate was 1 euro=1.29 dollars, so even according to Monday’s rate, I should still have had 9675 dollars, rather than 9477.75 dollars. They said then that they have their own rate (which was 1:1,23 on Monday), and don’t refer to the market rate. However, there is no way for us to check their rate on line. Besides, on their website, in the section “foreign exchange”, they put “FX calculator”, which is the market rate. But when clients really make a wire transfer, they give us another rate, which is not available on line, and we have no access to it. I check the market rate every day, and 1 euro:1.23 dollar is unheard of!



The rate is so opaque and they can give us any rate they want during wire transfer processes. HSBC is the world’s largest bank group, and it’s hard to believe that they are so opaque when dealing with wire transfers. My impression is that they are making money in giving bad rate (which is not available on line) to customers.



I am sure that I am not the only victim of wire transfer conflicts. When I search on Google, it proves that there are lots of complaints alike. I think that a report on wire transfer issue would draw public’s attention on this, and there would be something to discover: money is tight in banks currently, and they try to make money whenever possible.



Read Next Complaint >>








Email Story   |   Comment on this Story



Read more consumer reviews from Complaint Catalog -> Banks/Credit Cards

Reader Comments:

Posted by fer4sur on 03/22/2009
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/435/RipOff0435799.htm Please’ read below or open’ the above report link, that has better line spacing.

Bank One N.A. moved-in March, 2001 {15 Year, 6.5 fixed, never seconded} Loan Transferred to Homeside Lending November, 2001 all posted payment’s achieved timely conformation from April, 2001 to March, 2002, twelve month old timely paid loan was demanding twelve $102.99 Escrow Shortage monthly’s from April, 2002 to March, 2003. Assistance Filing “Proof of Claim” against Washington Mutual’s Bankruptcy is needed before 3/31/2009 deadline.

November 19, 2004 Washington Mutual requested patience’ promising loan history production’ relating “The Comptroller of the Currency” and “Better Business Bureau” involvement relative to second’ ignored R.E.S.P.A. “Qualified Written Request” telephonically on December 15, 2004 loan management conversed, that Bankruptcy STAY’ was released and loan history was transferred to Washington Mutual archive department in Chicago. Archive department instantly e-mailed unclenched’ loan histories, ending loan manager’s “48 month” covert “Principal Curtailment” concealment, and erroneous Escrow reduction missing fund’s concealment, the Better Business Bureau then removed Washington Mutual’s chief arbitrator chair, expelling for three year’s, “speaking retrospect-fully’ acquiring Credit Report in 2002’ would-have averted Foreclosure Theft’ nothing else!” Case Number 02-xxxxx-H3-13 including Core Adversary Trial’s Appealed award, from at 4541 County Road 138A Alvin, Texas 77511


Posted by tanfield77 on 03/14/2010
YOU ARE RIGHT BUT YOU CAN CHECK THEIR RATE I.E "COST OF FUNDS": BLOOMBERG, REUTERS, YAHOO AND MANY OTHERS WILL PROVIDE HISTORIC OFFER SIDE FX RATES AT THE MOMENT THE TRANSFER WAS MADE. BIG BANKS REGULARLY RIP OFF RETAIL CUSTOMERS THINKING THEY WON'T KNOW THIS. IT IS FAIR FOR THEM TO CHARGE SOME MARKUP OVER "INSTITUIONAL CROSS RATES" WHICH ARE USUALLY ONLY FOR LARGE TRADES OF $1.0 MILLION OR MORE. BUT THESE FX THIEVES USUALLY CHARGE RETAIL CUSTOMERS 6-7% ABOVE THAT RATE WHICH IS A RIPOFF.



Home    Consumer Resources    Browse Complaint Catalog       Terms & Conditions/Privacy Policy    Frequently Asked Questions

Copyright 2005-2011 Complaint.TV       Questions? E-mail us: admin@complaint.tv